I don’t expect all Canadians to have anything in common, even those things which are “typically” seen as Canadian, those things which as easily recognizable as Canadian, those characteristics which brand Canada and everyone who lives here. I don’t like hockey, I don’t drink beer that much and I don’t like national and cultural classifications, assuming that living within certain geographical boundaries defines the people that we can become. Being Canadian doesn’t define me. Would I be different had I grown up somewhere else? Maybe... but there are things inside of me that I feel are irrevocable, and will stay with me no matter where I go and what I do, things that I believe would be a part of me no matter where I was raised. I grew up in rural south-western Ontario, where diversity was nonexistent, where everyone was white, where a very small-town, sort of “Hicksville” mentality tried to smother those who were different. And I was always different, I was a nerd, a goth, then a harcore Marxist – I was always the weird kid with radical ideas who no one understood, and what’s more, no one really wanted to. I wasn’t raised in a diverse metropolitan centre like Toronto, in fact my small town, Strathroy if you wanted to know, couldn’t be more different from Toronto or Montreal. Canada is too large and diverse to be cohesive. I don’t think I could begin to describe the culture of Canada, because I don’t think that it truly exists.
Something which is seen as “Canadian” is the acceptance of multiculturalism, but my experience growing up in Canada was not characterized by diversity. If I wasn’t raised anywhere near diversity, why do I embrace it? I don’t think it has anything to do with being Canadian, I think it has everything to do with being a tolerant person who believes in equality and individuality – this is who I choose to be. I would be this way if I had grown up in the USA, or Australia, or the UK.
My strong environmentalism would be another aspect of myself I do not think I could escape, whether I grew up in the Great White North or not. Wilderness and respect for it is supposed to be a part of Canada’s culture isn’t it? Isn’t it perceived that way, both by Canadians and others? When really the reality is that Canada is lagging behind in preserving our natural spaces, with a marked reluctance from not only government, but the Canadian people, to change how we exploit the land which we have claimed for our own. And so in some aspects of “culture” I see lies – comforting falsehoods that people can whisper to themselves, use a shield to protect themselves from needing to claim personal responsibility to change. The illusion that Canada is eco-friendly serves to placate entire masses of people who could do something to preserve some of the most biologically diverse and unique areas of the world. Canada has 1/3 of the world’s wetlands and 1/5 of the world’s wilderness – and we’re not protecting them. Instead of characterizing ourselves by a mistaken cultural identity of being tree-huggers, why don’t we let our actions and our environmental track record speak for itself? The truth is there, and it doesn’t make us look like tree-huggers - quite the opposite. The multiculturalism is mentioned above is another illusion of our "Canadian identity." One need lool no farther than the First Nations to see very clearly that we are not as accepting, or as supportive of those who are different from the European-descended "norm" than we would like to believe. It seems ironic to me that those who were here first, on this land we call Canada, are now pushed to the margins and excluded by our so-called multicultural society.
But Hey! We’re Canada! We’re diverse! – In other words, let’s not do anything about it. We don’t need to do anything about it.
A nation is an artificial construction, and I would rather be defined by the way I interact with the world around me, by how I treat the environment, and how I treat my fellow human beings – and these are my choices. This has nothing to do with a “state” or with “Canada.” I actually have a strong aversion to nationalism, I think of it as misplaced loyalty to a “state” - when our loyalty should be to the earth and to each other. What’s more, nationalism often walks with its extreme sibling, patriotism, and together they have misled, caused wars, and continue to perpetuate injustice.
I don’t like to think of culture in terms of being defined by nation-states, an individual can choose how they want to move through the world, an individual can choose who or what to associate themselves with – and I hope that individuals can see past the veil, past the illusions about our identity that Canadian “culture” tries to perpetuate. I choose to distance myself from nationalism, I don’t want to let a love of an artificial entity overcome my empathy for the earth and others. Nationalism places “the nation” above “we the people” and above nature, and by associating my culture with a nation, by accepting cultural stereotypes and using them to help define myself, I am stepping towards that precipice.

I really like how you talked about embracing other cultures as a personal thing. We are either raised to embrace diversity, or we're not. When people say that Canada is such a diverse country. Its totally not! Its only Toronto, Montreal or Vancouver. The rest of Canada is all beige...
ReplyDeleteGood post
Strathroy sounds like a pretty crappy place to grow up. - Sounds like the kind of place where you go out in the field and play corn wars. - Sounds like the kind of place you go out and burn down country shacks for fun. - Sounds like the kind of place where high school jocks make fun of mentally disabled kids... Strathroy sounds like a pretty crappy place to group up. Maybe that's why you sound so cynical.
ReplyDeleteIronically, I think what you are saying IS a big part of Canadian culture, well my favourite part anyways - the wild, rebellious streak that creates diversity. But... who am I to say?
ReplyDeleteWhoa, that is a deeper question than I had intended. Who am I? Who are you? How do we know and who cares?
These may seem like easy questions at first glance, but as a Canadian I would argue that they are indeed far from facile.
Perhaps Canada isn't 'cohesive', but it is diverse... and although that doesn't imply multiculturalism your resistant spirit might just improve its likelihood...
Inspiring comments.
P.S. just FYI, Canada has 1/4 of the world's wetlands and 1/3 of its boreal forest... but still, your point was very well made ;)
Hey, I think you make some good points, and I believe it is a falsehood that we believe we are so environmentally-conscious, when in fact we are no better than many other countries we seem to mock.
ReplyDeleteIn regards to diversity, you have to appreciate the less discriminatory climate Canada has, in comparison to other countries. This very fact sheds some light on diversity; and the appreciation for multiculturalism seems to grow.
You are right about nationalism. I think it was H.G. Wells who said that the first product of pride was ignorance. Yes, pride can blindfold us, unable to see the truth. For Canada, I believe this "blindfold" to be more of a unifying entity; which does quite the opposite. This unifying entity is multiculturalism and tolerance for culture. It makes us proud that we are diverse.
Yes, Toronto and Montreal and the other metropolitan areas of Canada are much more multicultural. You also have to respect the culture of people living in these rural areas, who should have just as much protection and display of their culture as everyone. Equality should encompass everyone, not only minorities.
Great post!
Adam
IT IS SIMPLY NOT TRUE that individuals can choose freely how they want to move through the world. Most people in this world will NEVER have an oppotunity to choose anything because they are busy with feeding themselves and their families. The mere fact that you wrote this phrase about being free to move through the world reflects the Canadian culture (or the culture of people from 'wealthy' nations if you like).
ReplyDeleteHey Anna, thanks for the feedback.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I think that you are misconstruing the point. I meant that cultural stereotypes are not universal and that individuals have an elements of choice in how little or how much they subscribe to them. This is ESPECIALLY true in places like Canada, which is what I was, specifically, writing in regards to. When I wrote 'free to move through the world' I did not mean 'wealthy enough to do whatever you want.' I meant that there is an element of choice in how you view the world and interact with others. I realize that the majority of the world do not spend time analyzing their cultural stereotypes and whether or not they adhere to them. This again, is not what I meant.
Bear in mind, I was speaking of myself, personally, and of Canada. I understand where you are coming from, but I think you misunderstood my motivation.
Oh, this is totally clear now. I agree with your point then.
ReplyDelete